Amerced

To 'amerce' someone is to punish them by a penalty, especially a monetary fine. This action implies a judgment or decree, typically from a court or other authority, for wrongdoing or failure to comply with regulations. The penalty's amount is often not fixed beforehand, but rather determined based on the severity of the offense and the circumstances surrounding it, often assessed as a matter of judgment rather than a pre-determined fee. The term suggests a formal imposition of a penalty, usually financial, and differentiates from more informal reprimands or warnings. The process of being amerced involves due consideration and a formal declaration of the fine levied. It highlights a system of accountability where transgressions are met with specific consequences, contributing to order and discipline.

Amerced meaning with examples

• Following the regulatory audit, the company was amerced for failing to implement adequate safety protocols. The substantial fine reflected the serious risks its employees faced. The judge considered the company's negligence and the potential harm that could have occurred when setting the amount. The legal process was drawn out but resulted in financial amends.
• The landlord, found guilty of violating housing codes, was amerced for each instance of neglect. The penalty was increased to emphasize the consistent disregard of tenant safety and wellbeing. The court aimed to incentivize improved property upkeep through substantial fees. The fines served as both punishment and as a deterrent against future violations.
• For repeated violations of copyright law, the online retailer was amerced a hefty sum. The penalty took into account the widespread nature of the infringements and the profits gained. The action sought to protect the rights of creators and discourage piracy. The decision send a clear signal that intellectual property violations carry financial risks.
• The former officer was amerced by the court following their conviction for accepting bribes. The judgment addressed the loss of public trust that the corruption inflicted. The amount of the fine reflected the level of dishonesty and the impact on those involved. This was seen as a way to uphold the integrity of law enforcement.
• The city council voted to amerce the construction firm for exceeding noise pollution limits during late-night work. The sum was justified by the disruption to local residents and the repeated violations. The fee was implemented to enforce environmental standards and regulate urban noise levels. This was seen as a necessary measure for community well-being.