Anti-elitist

An anti-elitist individual or sentiment opposes the concentration of power and influence in the hands of a select few, typically those perceived as belonging to a privileged class or intellectual elite. This opposition often stems from a belief in egalitarianism, the idea that all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities, and a distrust of hierarchical structures. Anti-elitism may manifest in political movements, social attitudes, and cultural expressions, often challenging established norms and power dynamics in favor of greater inclusivity and accessibility. It frequently emphasizes the importance of the 'common person' and values lived experiences over theoretical expertise.

Anti-elitist meaning with examples

• The populist movement's rise was fueled by anti-elitist rhetoric, with candidates promising to champion the interests of ordinary citizens against the perceived corruption and detachment of the political elite. These platforms often demonized experts, media outlets, and established institutions, claiming they were out of touch with the 'real' concerns of the working class. This fueled a surge of support, but some argue it also undermined evidence-based policy making.
• Online discussions frequently become battlegrounds for anti-elitist sentiment. Conspiracy theories, often shared widely on social media, flourish when distrust in scientists, journalists, or government officials becomes the norm. A skepticism of 'official narratives' fosters an environment where any source of information is viewed equally valid, challenging the authority of experts. This can hamper productive conversations and the spread of misinformation.
• Artists can embody anti-elitism by challenging traditional artistic conventions and embracing diverse perspectives. This may involve incorporating folk art traditions, incorporating the art of marginalized communities, and rejecting high-brow cultural standards. This encourages a more inclusive approach to cultural production and audience engagement. This can also serve as a critique of the gatekeeping of institutions.
• The rise of the gig economy can be seen as both a manifestation of and a response to anti-elitist values. By decentralizing work, and offering opportunities outside of traditional careers, this gives people more options. Critics, however, highlight the precarity and lack of worker protections inherent in these models and the disproportionate affect on the less privileged classes. The debate centers on autonomy and the fairness of these platforms.