Antischolar

An 'antischolar' is an individual who actively opposes or discredits the principles, methods, or values associated with academic scholarship and rigorous intellectual inquiry. This opposition can manifest in various forms, from rejecting established knowledge and critical thinking to promoting misinformation, pseudoscience, or biased interpretations. An antischolar often prioritizes subjective beliefs, personal opinions, or political agendas over evidence-based analysis and thorough research. They may attack academics, research institutions, and the scientific process itself, potentially aiming to undermine the pursuit of knowledge and objective truth. The core characteristic of an antischolar is the deliberate devaluation and dismantling of scholarly endeavors. Often seen to use manipulation in arguments and data collection, a method to support an already formed opinion.

Antischolar meaning with examples

• The author's dismissal of scientific consensus on climate change, citing 'personal intuition' over peer-reviewed research, clearly positions them as an antischolar. Their disregard for empirical evidence reflects a deliberate rejection of established academic principles, favoring unverified claims. The author's approach deliberately ignores or downplays contradictory evidence.
• During the debate on education, the politician repeatedly attacked university professors, accusing them of promoting 'leftist indoctrination' and rejecting their research as 'biased propaganda.' This blatant attack against the authority and knowledge of academics identifies the politician as an antischolar, undermining their credibility and knowledge.
• In online forums, the individual consistently shared conspiracy theories and attacked scientists and scholars, labeling them as 'elites' and 'puppets' of a hidden agenda. Their rejection of established research, especially in the areas of vaccinations and medical research, demonstrates a blatant opposition to academic scholarship, marking them as an antischolar.
• The activist group regularly disrupts academic lectures, publishes articles that misrepresent scientific findings, and pressures institutions to censor research that contradicts their ideological viewpoint, thereby positioning them as an antischolar by systematically challenging and rejecting established scholarly information and methods.