Aspersion

An aspersion is a damaging or disparaging remark or statement; a false or misleading accusation meant to harm someone's reputation. It often involves spreading negative information or casting doubt upon a person's integrity, character, or motives. Asperions can be subtle insinuations, direct accusations, or innuendo, and they are frequently delivered with the intent to defame or discredit the subject. They can be spread through various channels, including gossip, social media, political campaigns, and the media. The power of an aspersion lies in its ability to create doubt and influence public opinion, even if the accusation is ultimately proven false or unfounded. The impact of an aspersion can be severe, leading to social ostracism, professional setbacks, and emotional distress.

Aspersion meaning with examples

• During the contentious election campaign, the opposing candidate cast aspersions on Senator Thompson's financial dealings, implying corruption without offering concrete evidence. These aspersions, widely publicized in the media, significantly damaged the senator's public image, creating a climate of suspicion and distrust. Although Thompson vehemently denied the allegations, the aspersions continued to be repeated, impacting his polling numbers. The accusations lingered, causing considerable turmoil for Thompson's family and staff.
• When the company's CEO announced a restructuring plan, disgruntled employees spread aspersions about his competence and leadership. They circulated rumors claiming he was unqualified and motivated solely by personal gain, hoping to undermine his authority. This campaign of aspersions created a hostile work environment and fueled internal conflict, making it harder to implement the changes. Many employees began to question the company's future. The resulting uncertainty affected productivity and morale.
• The journalist's investigative report contained carefully worded aspersions about the scientist's research methodology. While not explicitly accusing the scientist of misconduct, the report subtly suggested that his data might be unreliable or manipulated. The strategic aspersions, presented with an air of objectivity, cast doubt on the validity of his findings and damaged his standing within the scientific community. The researcher faced a significant amount of scrutiny from peers and funders.
• In the aftermath of the scandal, the community was riddled with aspersions against those suspected of wrongdoing. Neighbors whispered criticisms, spreading unsubstantiated rumors, and forming factions. These aspersions, based on speculation rather than facts, fractured relationships and heightened tensions within the town. Accusations were thrown around frequently, leading to social division and creating a sense of paranoia. The community was significantly affected by the fallout from unproven claims.