Authority-dominated
Authority-dominated describes a system, society, or situation where power and control are primarily held and exercised by a central authority figure or group. This often results in a hierarchical structure with limited autonomy or decision-making power for those below. It emphasizes a top-down approach, where directives and decisions originate from the top and are expected to be followed without significant dissent or negotiation. Such environments often prioritize order, conformity, and obedience to established rules and procedures over individual expression or independent thought. The term can carry negative connotations, implying a suppression of freedom, dissent, and innovation, or positive ones where order and efficiency are desired.
Authority-dominated meaning with examples
- The company culture, under its authority-dominated CEO, stifled creativity. Employees were afraid to suggest new ideas, leading to a decline in innovation. The rigid structure prevented open communication and feedback, creating a stressful and unproductive work environment. The focus was solely on achieving targets set from above, leaving little room for individual growth.
- Life in the historically authority-dominated kingdom was defined by strict social hierarchies. Every aspect of daily life, from farming practices to religious rituals, was governed by royal decree. The king's word was law, and any opposition was swiftly and severely punished, reinforcing the absolute power wielded by the monarchy and preventing societal change.
- The classroom, characterized by authority-dominated instruction, limited student engagement. The teacher lectured for most of the period, requiring students to passively absorb information. Questions were rare, as students were discouraged from expressing doubts. This pedagogical approach favored rote memorization over critical thinking and independent analysis.
- Following the military coup, the country experienced a period of authority-dominated rule. The junta implemented strict censorship, curtailed freedom of the press, and suppressed political opposition. Civil liberties were suspended, and the military controlled all aspects of government. The transition to democracy was therefore slow and challenging.