Avariciousness

Avariciousness refers to an extreme and obsessive greed for wealth or material gain. It is a character trait marked by a relentless desire to accumulate possessions, often exceeding practical needs or social boundaries. This insatiable hunger can manifest in various ways, including hoarding, exploiting others for financial advantage, and prioritizing wealth over ethical considerations or relationships. The avaricious individual typically finds little satisfaction in their accumulated riches, constantly yearning for more, and is often distrustful and secretive about their wealth. The driving force behind avariciousness is a deep-seated insecurity and a belief that material possessions equate to power and security.

Avariciousness meaning with examples

• The businessman's avariciousness was evident in his ruthless pursuit of profits, even if it meant cutting corners and exploiting his employees. He seemed to care little for the well-being of others, only for the expansion of his empire. His constant accumulation left him perpetually dissatisfied and alienated from his family, consumed by the pursuit of more.
• Driven by avariciousness, the nobleman spent a lifetime collecting rare jewels, neglecting his estate and the welfare of his tenants. His obsession consumed him, leading to isolation and paranoia. He became known for his stinginess, always fearing someone would attempt to take his vast collection of jewelry, so he locked himself away in the most secluded tower of his castle.
• The downfall of the empire was fueled by the emperor's avariciousness. His relentless taxation of the populace to fund his lavish lifestyle and build monuments led to widespread poverty and resentment. This fiscal policy was a key factor in the economic collapse. It was this insatiable desire to drain resources that led to rebellion.
• The politician's avariciousness was exposed when details of his offshore accounts and undisclosed investments became public. His constituents felt betrayed and his reputation was ruined when it was shown that he was actively enriching himself at the expense of the public good. His unethical use of public funds eroded trust.