Bicycle-hostile

Describes an environment, system, infrastructure, or policy that actively discourages or hinders bicycle use. This can manifest in various ways, including a lack of dedicated bicycle lanes, dangerous road conditions, inadequate bike parking facilities, policies that favor automobiles, and a general lack of consideration for the needs of cyclists. bicycle-hostile environments prioritize vehicular traffic and often neglect the safety, convenience, and accessibility of cycling as a viable mode of transportation. They often result in cyclists feeling unsafe, unwelcome, and overlooked. These environments are frequently associated with increased traffic congestion, reduced air quality, and limited opportunities for healthy, sustainable transportation options.

Bicycle-hostile meaning with examples

• The city's main thoroughfare, with its narrow sidewalks, speeding cars, and lack of bike lanes, is decidedly bicycle-hostile. Cycling there feels dangerous, making it impossible for people to cycle to work. This discourages residents from embracing a healthier mode of transport, reinforcing the city’s reliance on cars and therefore increasing pollution. The lack of consideration for cyclist safety reinforces the perception that bicycle riders aren’t considered. Without significant infrastructure improvements, cycling will remain a dangerous option.
• The planning commission's decision to eliminate planned bike lanes in favor of widening roads demonstrates a bicycle-hostile approach. This prioritizes car capacity over cyclist safety, discouraging bicycle travel. It sends the message that automobiles are favored, ignoring the environmental and health benefits of cycling. Local bike advocacy groups expressed their concern to no avail. Their concerns highlighted the negative impact of increased traffic on local air quality, further exacerbating the bicycle-hostile environment.
• The architecture of the new shopping center with vast parking lots and no secure bike racks presents a bicycle-hostile design. This limits options, hindering bike commuting. The complete disregard for cyclists reflects an outdated urban planning approach, making it inconvenient for people to visit. It is an uninviting environment for anyone who would like to use a bicycle. The lack of alternative transportation options promotes a culture of car dependency and increased traffic congestion.
• Many suburban neighborhoods, with their sprawling layouts and dependence on car travel, are inherently bicycle-hostile. These areas have no safe cycling routes, making it difficult to access shops and services. The lack of interconnected streets makes cycling difficult. They lack the infrastructure to support cycling, isolating residents, and reducing opportunities for physical activity. This layout reinforces car dependency and contributes to social isolation.
• Policies within the company that do not support cyclist riders also support a bicycle-hostile environment. The lack of designated bike storage, no shower facilities, and the failure to provide bicycle-related bonuses are all examples of bicycle-hostile practices. These show that the company doesn’t value cyclists. Such lack of support is the difference between an inviting and a hostile environment for employees who cycle to work, reducing staff morale and potentially causing environmental impact.