Bleeding-heart

A 'bleeding-heart' describes a person, particularly a politician or public figure, perceived as excessively sympathetic towards those suffering, especially social and economic disadvantages. This often manifests as favoring policies and initiatives aimed at helping the underprivileged, even when such policies are considered costly or controversial. The term implies that this sympathy is sometimes impractical, sentimental, or overly emotional, potentially overlooking broader considerations or consequences. The descriptor is often used pejoratively, implying naiveté or a lack of realism in addressing complex societal issues. Critics might accuse a 'bleeding-heart' of prioritizing feelings over logic, practicality, and economic realities. It suggests a strong emotional reaction to the plight of others, possibly at the expense of rational decision-making or fiscal responsibility.

Bleeding-heart meaning with examples

• The conservative commentator attacked the proposed welfare reform, labeling its proponents as 'bleeding-hearts' who prioritized feel-good measures over fiscal prudence. He argued that the plan would be unsustainable and would ultimately harm the very people it aimed to help. The pundit often used this term when attacking social welfare programs and politicians that supported them.
• During the debate, the candidate was accused of being a 'bleeding-heart' liberal for advocating increased government spending on education and healthcare. His opponent argued that such policies were fiscally irresponsible and would lead to higher taxes, despite his rebuttals that the plan would alleviate suffering. The audience seemed to agree with the opposing candidate more.
• Her colleagues dismissed her progressive stance on immigration as 'bleeding-heart' idealism, claiming it ignored the potential economic and social challenges associated with open borders. They thought her compassion clouded her judgment about security concerns. They claimed that a stricter policy was more beneficial to society.
• The editorial criticized the mayor's 'bleeding-heart' approach to crime, suggesting that her leniency towards criminals was emboldening lawlessness. The writer supported that a tougher stance was needed to deter future offenses. The response resulted in the mayor defending her position, claiming that her policies focused on rehabilitation and community engagement.
• Some critics of the organization considered its humanitarian efforts to be a 'bleeding-heart' campaign, claiming it was more focused on publicity than achieving meaningful results, with the media spotlighting the organization's founder. They accused the group of making problems bigger than they needed to be. Others felt that some of the organization's efforts were misguided.