Bloodsucker

A 'bloodsucker' is a colloquial and often pejorative term for an organism or person that obtains sustenance or benefit by exploiting or taking advantage of others, especially in a parasitic or predatory manner. The term frequently implies a lack of empathy, moral integrity, and an excessive focus on self-gain at the expense of the wellbeing of others. It can be used to describe a literal creature that feeds on blood, or more figuratively, a person who is perceived to be draining resources or exploiting someone emotionally, financially, or in other ways. The term suggests a sense of resentment and moral condemnation. The implications vary based on context but center around exploitation and unfairness. Often implies using someone's trust for gain.

Bloodsucker meaning with examples

• The unscrupulous businessman was seen as a 'bloodsucker' by his employees, constantly demanding more work and paying them less. He profited immensely while the workers struggled, creating a hostile environment. His lavish lifestyle was funded on the backs of others, making him a symbol of greed and callous disregard for the people who helped build his empire. The situation created tension. It was said he never cared about anyone.
• That parasitic tick is a true 'bloodsucker,' relentlessly feasting on the dog's blood! It burrowed in, and it looked disgusting. We had to remove it carefully. The dog was visibly irritated and itchy, demonstrating the direct harm inflicted by this external parasite. Its feeding habits and actions was causing suffering and was a danger to the dog. They are considered the worst type of pests.
• The landlord, known for his exorbitant rent increases and neglect of the property, was labeled a 'bloodsucker' by the tenants. He ignored their complaints about mold and leaks while consistently demanding higher payments, showcasing his indifference to their needs. He made no efforts to improve living conditions. They had no choice but to pay. He took no responsibility for the problems.
• The politician, accused of accepting bribes from wealthy corporations while advocating for policies that hurt the public, was called a 'bloodsucker' in the media. The media focused on the politician's willingness to sacrifice the needs of the people for their own financial gain, highlighting their hypocrisy and corruption. His actions demonstrated a complete disregard for the consequences of their policies on the population.