Conciliationist

A conciliationist is an individual who favors or actively pursues a policy of conciliation. This means they believe in resolving disputes or conflicts through diplomacy, compromise, and peaceful means. They often advocate for finding common ground, fostering understanding, and avoiding aggressive or confrontational approaches. Conciliationists prioritize dialogue, negotiation, and mediation as the primary tools for achieving peaceful settlements. They are generally optimistic about the potential for reaching mutually acceptable solutions even in challenging circumstances. They view conflict as something to be managed and overcome collaboratively rather than something to be won or dominated.

Conciliationist meaning with examples

• The seasoned diplomat, known for his calm demeanor and emphasis on dialogue, was considered a true conciliationist. He tirelessly worked to bridge the gap between warring factions, always searching for opportunities to build trust and find common ground. Despite facing considerable opposition, he consistently advocated for peaceful negotiations and compromise, earning him respect and admiration from all sides.
• During the heated labor dispute, the union leadership adopted a conciliationist approach. They were willing to engage in constructive discussions with management, seeking a fair settlement through mediation and negotiation. Their strategy focused on identifying shared interests and finding mutually beneficial solutions, rather than resorting to aggressive tactics like strikes or pickets.
• In the ongoing international crisis, the country's foreign minister, a noted conciliationist, repeatedly called for de-escalation and a return to the negotiating table. He argued that military intervention would only worsen the situation, emphasizing the need for peaceful dialogue and diplomatic solutions to address the underlying issues.
• The political party, reflecting the values of its key advisors who leaned into conciliationist philosophies, sought to build consensus with its rivals. This strategic focus involved making incremental compromises, participating in bipartisan discussions, and attempting to bridge ideological differences rather than intensifying the political divide.