Condemnatory

Condemnatory describes language, actions, or judgments that express strong disapproval or censure. It implies a finding of fault, blame, or wrong-doing, often with the intention of expressing punishment or disapproval. This tone or action can be directed at individuals, groups, behaviors, or ideas. The degree of disapproval can range from mild criticism to harsh, punitive pronouncements. condemnatory acts can be official, such as a court's sentencing, or informal, like a public shaming. The underlying purpose is to express negative judgment and often includes an element of moral or ethical assessment. condemnatory statements are often assertive and are used to denounce actions perceived as harmful, unjust, or unacceptable. They aim to discourage those actions, often emphasizing the negative consequences of the behavior being judged.

Condemnatory meaning with examples

• The editorial board published a condemnatory article criticizing the company's environmental record, accusing them of prioritizing profits over ecological responsibility. The piece was filled with sharp criticism, citing numerous instances of pollution and disregard for environmental regulations. The article's tone left no doubt about their stance on the company's harmful practices, aimed at spurring public backlash and action.
• Following the controversial political scandal, the opposition party released a series of condemnatory statements against the ruling administration. They accused them of corruption, incompetence, and abuse of power. Each statement was crafted to galvanize public outrage and rally support. The statements called for immediate investigations, aiming to hold the individuals accountable for their actions and potentially remove them.
• The judge's closing remarks were highly condemnatory, directly rebuking the defendant's behavior and emphasizing the severity of the crime. The judge, highlighting the pain inflicted upon the victims, explicitly sentenced the defendant to jail. The speech also had a warning for anyone else contemplating similar offenses, with clear implications of strict penalties for those found guilty of similar actions.
• The art critic's review was fiercely condemnatory, dismissing the artist's new exhibition as vapid, pretentious, and lacking in originality. He specifically attacked the technical execution and intellectual concepts, suggesting the artist had abandoned their previous strengths. The review aimed to publicly discredit the artist's work. It suggested that a new direction or a serious reassessment was urgently needed.
• After the public's uproar, the corporation issued a condemnatory apology, distancing itself from its employee's insensitive social media posts. The company declared the posts were entirely inconsistent with its values and commitment to diversity. The apology aimed to repair reputational damage and reassure stakeholders. It also promised a thorough investigation and appropriate disciplinary action to address the controversial and unacceptable conduct.