Counter-liberal

A 'counter-liberal' refers to an individual or ideology that actively opposes, critiques, or offers an alternative to traditional liberal principles, policies, and societal values. This opposition can manifest in various ways, from challenging specific liberal policies (e.g., taxation, social programs) to rejecting broader liberal tenets such as individual autonomy, secularism, and progressivism. counter-liberal stances often emphasize concepts like tradition, community, religious values, national identity, or economic conservatism as alternatives or correctives to perceived liberal shortcomings. The intensity and focus of the counter-liberal perspective can range significantly, spanning from moderate critiques to more radical rejections of the entire liberal framework.

Counter-liberal meaning with examples

• In response to the perceived excesses of social liberalism, the political party adopted a counter-liberal stance, emphasizing individual responsibility and family values. Their platform strongly advocated for reduced government spending and a return to what they considered traditional societal norms. This caused a significant shift in the political landscape.
• The philosopher’s work provided a robust counter-liberal critique of the emphasis on radical individualism found in many contemporary social movements, arguing for a renewed focus on shared moral frameworks and the importance of social cohesion.
• Faced with the rise of globalism and free trade, the nationalist movement embraced a counter-liberal ideology, prioritizing national sovereignty and protectionist economic policies, often arguing for tighter border controls and limits on immigration as a response.
• The organization formed with the primary goal of countering what it considered the liberal bias of the mainstream media, promoting alternative viewpoints and providing resources for those dissatisfied with traditional liberal perspectives. This included conservative think tanks and media platforms.
• During the debates, the candidate presented a compelling counter-liberal argument against the proposed legislation on environmental regulations, highlighting its potential negative impact on economic growth and individual freedoms, appealing to a segment of the population that felt it was detrimental.