Cross-examine

To question a witness at a trial or hearing, especially by the opposing attorney, to challenge or discredit their testimony or to elicit further information. This process involves asking questions to expose inconsistencies, reveal biases, or clarify ambiguities in the witness's previous statements or evidence. The goal is often to undermine the witness's credibility or to introduce alternative interpretations of the facts presented. Cross-examination is a crucial part of the adversarial legal system, ensuring that both sides have the opportunity to scrutinize the evidence and present their case fully. It’s a skill requiring keen observation, quick thinking, and a deep understanding of the case's details. Successful cross-examination can significantly influence the outcome of a trial.

Cross-examine meaning with examples

• The defense attorney meticulously prepared to cross-examine the prosecution's star witness, aiming to expose inconsistencies in her account of the events. He focused on her memory of the details to uncover any doubt of the events. The attorney hoped to cast doubt on her reliability, trying to sway the jury to a less harsh judgement.
• During the trial, the opposing lawyer began to cross-examine the plaintiff, questioning her about her previous claims. The lawyer used pointed questions, revealing her past history, searching to paint a picture of manipulation in order to build a better case to the jury. This aggressive questioning sought to weaken her case.
• The judge allowed the lawyer to cross-examine the expert witness on the methodology used in their analysis. He challenged the witness, pressing them to admit weakness in their process. By examining the witness, the lawyers sought to cast doubt on the validity of the expert's opinions and, therefore, the evidence.
• After the witness concluded her direct examination, the other lawyer was eager to cross-examine, hoping to unveil facts. The opposing lawyer planned to expose any possible ulterior motives, revealing conflicting facts. She prepared carefully to make sure to uncover any potential biases or inaccuracies in her testimony.
• The skilled lawyer decided to cross-examine the key witness, attempting to get a favorable response. He probed for more information, building his case for the jury. This strategic move aimed to exploit any weaknesses in the witness's testimony and advance the lawyer's clients position, bolstering the cases likelihood of winning.