Dastardliness

Dastardliness refers to a cowardly and treacherous act or behavior, characterized by a lack of courage, moral principle, and often involving inflicting harm or taking advantage of someone weaker or defenseless. It encompasses actions that are mean-spirited, underhanded, and often involve deceit or betrayal. The term highlights a despicable form of wickedness, exposing the base nature of the individual or actions displaying an intentional disregard for the well-being or safety of others, and a willingness to resort to cruel or dishonorable tactics to achieve their goals, or solely for the gratification of evil intent. It is the antithesis of bravery, honesty, and integrity.

Dastardliness meaning with examples

• The general's act of ordering the execution of surrendering soldiers was a display of shocking dastardliness, violating the codes of war and basic human decency. His cowardice and cruelty stained his reputation forever. Those under his command whispered in fear and shame of his malicious choices. His actions brought only dishonor and distrust to the entire army and their cause.
• The politician's leaked information and character assassination against his opponent were a stark display of dastardliness. The campaign was quickly filled with fear, anger, and doubt about everyone. Such underhanded tactics and dishonest behavior undermined fair debate and the democratic process, revealing his lack of principles and ethical compass, he would stop at nothing to win.
• The cyber-attacker's theft of sensitive personal data and extortion demands, targeting vulnerable individuals, was a particularly cruel form of dastardliness. This type of wickedness preys on people's fears and financial hardship. Such callous indifference to the damage inflicted demonstrates the attackers selfish evil intent and lack of humanity.
• The king's secret poisoning of his own brother, to secure the throne, was a profound act of dastardliness, marked by betrayal and ruthlessness. This horrific act removed any doubt of who should be the rightful heir. It was a cowardly choice, demonstrating a willingness to sacrifice family for selfish gain, highlighting the depth of his villainy and moral corruption.