Demolishable

Demolishable describes something capable of being demolished or destroyed, meaning it can be broken down into smaller pieces, rendered useless, or eliminated entirely. This typically refers to structures, buildings, or objects but can be applied metaphorically to ideas, systems, or concepts. The term implies a degree of vulnerability and impermanence, suggesting that the subject is susceptible to forces of destruction, time, or intentional dismantling. The process often involves deliberate acts, natural disasters, or decay. demolishable things can be reduced to rubble, fragmented components, or rendered non-functional. This contrasts with concepts like durability, permanence, and indestructibility. It is the physical embodiment of fragility and inevitable decline.

Demolishable meaning with examples

• The old factory was deemed demolishable after decades of neglect. Its outdated infrastructure and the presence of hazardous materials made its continued existence a liability. The city council approved its demolition, clearing the way for a modern residential complex. The carefully planned explosion reduced the building to a pile of debris within minutes. The former eyesore was removed as it was structurally unsound.
• The antiquated government system was considered demolishable by the reform movement. Its rigid bureaucracy and inefficient processes hampered progress and stifled innovation. Proponents of change argued that the system's flaws were too deep-seated to be repaired, necessitating its complete overhaul or outright demolition. The people wanted an updated government.
• The sandcastle, a beautiful testament to childhood creativity, was unfortunately demolishable by the approaching tide. Despite careful construction, the relentless waves slowly eroded its walls and turrets. The children watched in awe as their creation was consumed by the sea, its temporary magnificence succumbing to the enduring power of nature. Nature's inevitable forces are not always kind.
• The argument, based on faulty assumptions and weak evidence, proved to be easily demolishable by the opposing team's expert analysis. The flaws in the logic and the unsupported claims were systematically dismantled, leaving the initial proposition in tatters. The team meticulously exposed the weaknesses in the argument, leaving little ground for the initial proposition to stand. The initial claim lacked the proper backing.