Denunciatorily

The adverb 'denunciatorily' describes an action or statement done in a way that expresses strong disapproval or condemnation, often in a public and accusatory manner. It implies a critical, often harsh judgment, frequently with the intent to expose wrongdoing or fault. It can suggest a tone of outrage, moral superiority, or a desire to punish. The manner is typically explicit, leaving no doubt about the negative assessment being made. The action itself might range from formal declarations to less formal, but equally critical, remarks.

Denunciatorily meaning with examples

• The senator, denunciatorily, pointed his finger at the CEO, accusing him of insider trading and demanding his immediate resignation. His words were filled with scorn, leaving the audience shocked, and highlighting the perceived injustice within the company. The scandal, laid bare by the accusations, now seemed irredeemable.
• The newspaper columnist, denunciatorily, exposed the unethical practices of the lobbying firm, publishing internal documents that detailed corrupt dealings. His series of articles revealed the extent of the influence peddling, shaking the political establishment. The firm and its clients, the targets of the media storm, were subject to intense scrutiny and damage.
• The activist, denunciatorily, confronted the factory owner about their pollution, holding up images of the contaminated river that the factory released waste into. Her impassioned speech, and the protest gathered, brought national media and public attention to the issue, putting pressure on local authorities to act and enforce environmental regulations.
• The teacher, denunciatorily, rebuked the students for cheating, telling them that their actions demonstrated a lack of integrity and a disrespect for the educational system. The public and obvious scolding brought a moment of shame to the classroom, and the teachers' public example acted as a warning to all involved.
• The whistleblower, denunciatorily, released classified documents revealing government corruption and malfeasance, even though the act could carry severe consequences. His actions, broadcast to the world, sparked a nationwide debate about transparency and accountability, and set in motion a long and difficult legal struggle.