Deprecations (plural of deprecation) refer to expressions of disapproval, criticism, or the act of belittling or disparaging something or someone. It involves diminishing the value, importance, or esteem of a person, idea, object, or action. These statements are often meant to express a negative judgment, show a lack of respect, or discourage acceptance or use. deprecations can manifest in various forms, including verbal attacks, written criticisms, public rebukes, or even subtle dismissals. They aim to lower the status or reputation of the subject, potentially discouraging support or acceptance. The core of deprecation lies in a deliberate act of underestimation.
Deprecations meaning with examples
- The author faced numerous deprecations from critics who vehemently disagreed with the controversial themes explored in his novel. They cited historical inaccuracies and weak character development, effectively trying to damage the work's standing. Public forums were filled with reviews that disparaged the narrative choices, attempting to dissuade potential readers from engaging with the book by highlighting its perceived flaws and limitations, influencing its reception.
- After the company announced its new policy, employees shared their deprecations of the change in the company's social media channels. They voiced complaints about the increased workload, the lack of communication, and the overall negative impact on their daily working lives. The comments section quickly filled with negative sentiments, with workers expressing concerns about job security, work/life balance, and management's decisions which added to the discord.
- The politician’s opponent used personal deprecations in their campaign speeches to undermine his credibility and sway voters. Their strategy involved publicizing the past scandals and character flaws, attempting to turn the public away from the candidate. Accusations, delivered with conviction, sought to discredit the candidate's platform, weakening the public trust. The goal was to portray the politician as unfit for office.
- During the debate, the scientist faced repeated deprecations of their research from a panel of peers, challenging the methodology used in his study. The panel members questioned assumptions, and raised ethical concerns, which put the research under a strong amount of negative scrutiny. Some attempted to undermine the findings, making it seem unreliable or flawed. They challenged their hypothesis and dismissed supporting data, hindering the widespread acceptance.
- The art critic’s deprecations of the new museum exhibit were harsh, describing the collection as uninspired and amateurish. The critic highlighted the poor selection of the works, the lack of originality, and the blatant lack of cohesiveness. Their words, printed across media platforms, attempted to diminish the value of the pieces, as if trying to prevent its acceptance by any art enthusiasts. The review caused significant controversy within the artistic community.