Disavowals are formal declarations of denial or rejection of a statement, action, or belief. They are often used to distance oneself or an organization from something, implicitly or explicitly. A disavowal aims to sever association and avoid responsibility or negative consequences stemming from the subject of the disavowal. The act of disavowing can apply to a wide array of subjects including specific claims, past behaviors, affiliations, or ideologies. The impact of a disavowal depends on its context, timing, and the credibility of the disavowing party.
Disavowals meaning with examples
- Following the controversial speech, the CEO issued several disavowals, distancing the company from its offensive remarks. Legal teams were deployed. This came after calls for boycotts and negative press. The firm was accused of failing to respect its customers. This swift response showcased a commitment to damage control and a desire to preserve the company's brand image.
- After discovering his employee's illicit activity, the manager made strong disavowals in his email. The manager's actions were aimed at reassuring the public of their values. He stated he was not involved, he distanced himself from the criminal, and launched an internal investigation. This helped to mitigate potential legal issues and protect the organization's reputation.
- In the wake of the scandal, the politician offered repeated disavowals to his constituents. He rejected their accusation about corruption. His action took place to maintain public trust and assure his innocence. He hoped to reduce the political fallout. Public relations experts told him his disavowals, although frequent, needed a more emphatic tone.
- The diplomat's official statements featured multiple disavowals of the government's actions. He stated that their conduct was a violation of human rights. This bold decision was made in the face of severe criticism. It served to signal a shift in policy. He hoped his action would improve relations with the international community.
- When the terrorist group claimed responsibility for the attack, the nation's leaders issued unwavering disavowals. They rejected any association with the event. They committed to bringing those responsible to justice. This was essential to demonstrate the country's stance against terrorism and to solidify global alliances. They emphasized their resolve.