Discrepancy-determined

Discrepancy-determined describes a process, method, or conclusion that is arrived at or significantly influenced by identifying and analyzing discrepancies, inconsistencies, or divergences. It emphasizes the crucial role of differences or disparities in the reasoning or methodology. It suggests that attention to variances, whether in data, observations, accounts, or expectations, is the primary driver for understanding, evaluation, or resolution. The 'discrepancy' acts as the key piece of information. This term highlights a proactive approach to problem-solving, where identifying what is out of sync leads to action.

Discrepancy-determined meaning with examples

• The auditor's investigation was discrepancy-determined; their final report focused solely on resolving any reported inconsistencies in the financial records. Any differences were seen as a sign of potential financial impropriety. They compared reported expenses against receipts, with the biggest differences generating further inquiries. This led to a better understanding of where money went wrong.
• The scientific method, in this experiment, was discrepancy-determined. Researchers carefully analyzed the data points and any variations in experimental trials. The research team actively sought out any deviations from the expected outcome. These discrepancies helped to identify areas where their theories needed adjusting and further testing was required, including the design of a new experiment.
• The historian's analysis of the historical accounts was discrepancy-determined. By comparing primary and secondary sources, the historian identified contradictions in narratives and chronologies, leading to a more nuanced interpretation of the events. These gaps helped them identify the key factors that caused the discrepancies in the first place. The resulting investigation revised the previous consensus view of the event.
• The security system operates in a discrepancy-determined manner. It monitors network traffic for any unusual patterns or behaviors, flagging anything that deviates from the established baseline. This system uses discrepancy as an indicator, making the information accessible. Any sudden drop in data use will immediately alert a security administrator. This allows for timely interventions to prevent threats.
• The detective's approach to solving the case was inherently discrepancy-determined. The detective meticulously interviewed witnesses, examining their testimonies and looking for any inconsistencies. It would use these differences to highlight the gaps. The detective created a new investigation file. This systematic approach would allow them to build a compelling case, leaving no inconsistencies unexplored.