Doctor-driven

Doctor-driven describes a system, process, or approach where the decisions, direction, and execution are primarily controlled, influenced, or determined by medical doctors or healthcare professionals. This often implies a focus on clinical expertise, medical protocols, and patient care, potentially prioritizing medical considerations over other factors like cost-effectiveness or patient preferences, depending on the context. doctor-driven practices can manifest in various settings, from treatment plans to research initiatives, highlighting the central role of medical professionals in shaping outcomes and methodologies. The term can also denote a specific operational structure, or a broader philosophy, in the healthcare sector.

Doctor-driven meaning with examples

• The hospital's doctor-driven approach to patient care, prioritizing specialist consultations, unfortunately led to longer wait times for routine check-ups. While focused on medical excellence, they could improve by taking the patients' perspective in consideration and reducing the administrative burdens on doctors. This highlighted the importance of balancing clinical expertise and patient access.
• In clinical trials, the doctor-driven experimental design placed greater emphasis on statistical significance. This, to the potential detriment of patient comfort and quality of life, led to lengthy trial periods. The rigorous control over data and procedures, however, provided a solid foundation for scientific rigor but potentially excluded less-conventional methods.
• The development of the new telemedicine platform was initially doctor-driven. The goal was to facilitate immediate remote patient care, but without engaging patients or incorporating user-friendly features, it had a low adoption rate. It was quickly adjusted, however, by creating a better experience for both patients and doctors.
• The evolution of the national health policy favored a doctor-driven model, with physicians empowered to decide on healthcare delivery and resource allocation. This resulted in improved medical outcomes, but it also limited the impact from community-based care programs. This highlighted the tension between local and systemic priorities.
• The research grant prioritized projects with a doctor-driven lead investigator. These projects, with their expert guidance and focus on medical breakthroughs, created major advances in treatments. However, this sometimes diverted funding from studies focused on preventative care or social determinants of health, thus creating an imbalance.