Dogmatic

Dogmatic describes someone or something characterized by a stubborn adherence to a set of beliefs or principles, often without consideration of evidence, opposing viewpoints, or alternative perspectives. It implies an unwavering conviction, sometimes to the point of arrogance, and a refusal to entertain doubt or compromise. A Dogmatic person may present their beliefs as absolute truths, expecting others to accept them without question. The word often carries a negative connotation, suggesting rigidity, closed-mindedness, and a resistance to change or critical thinking. It can apply to individuals, ideologies, or systems of thought.

Dogmatic meaning with examples

• The professor's Dogmatic approach to teaching stifled intellectual curiosity. He insisted on lecturing without allowing any student questions, rigidly adhering to a pre-determined syllabus and dismissing any perspectives outside of his own. His unwavering certainty on every topic, no matter how nuanced, created an atmosphere of intellectual intimidation. Students were afraid to challenge his views for fear of ridicule.
• The political party's Dogmatic stance on economic policy prevented any meaningful discussion with the opposition. Their unwavering commitment to free-market principles, regardless of the social consequences, made compromise impossible. They rejected all arguments for government intervention as inherently flawed and refused to consider alternative approaches to solving complex issues like poverty or income inequality.
• The religious leader's Dogmatic interpretations of scripture caused great conflict within the community. He presented his specific understanding of the texts as the only valid interpretation, condemning anyone who disagreed as heretical. This rigid adherence to his particular viewpoint resulted in the exclusion and ostracization of those with different perspectives.
• Despite evidence to the contrary, the scientist remained Dogmatic in his belief in his original theory. Even with the new data which provided opposing results, he remained convinced that his initial hypothesis was the correct one, refusing to acknowledge any flaws in his logic or methodology, this blinded him from seeing the real truth.