Double-talk

Double-talk is a type of communication characterized by ambiguous, evasive, or deliberately confusing language, often used to deceive or mislead. It involves speaking in a way that appears to convey meaning but, upon closer examination, contains contradictory or nonsensical statements. The speaker typically avoids taking a clear position, providing concrete information, or making firm commitments. Double-talk is a form of obfuscation that aims to create uncertainty or confusion, making it difficult for the listener to understand the true intent or message. It may involve the use of jargon, euphemisms, or vague generalities to obscure the speaker's actual thoughts or intentions. Double-talk can be used in many settings, from politics to everyday conversations.

Double-talk meaning with examples

• The politician, during a press conference, used Double-talk when asked about a controversial policy. They stated, 'We are exploring all options within the parameters of the situation, balancing the various considerations to ensure a positive outcome.' This vague response avoided a direct answer and concealed their stance. It created the appearance of action without committing to a specific plan, a prime example of double-talk.
• In a corporate meeting, the CEO gave a Double-talk filled announcement about upcoming restructuring. "We're aiming to optimize synergies and enhance our core competencies to drive future growth. There will be some strategic adjustments to maximize value." This avoids acknowledging potential layoffs or specific changes, instead offering vague, corporate jargon that means little to employees or stakeholders.
• During negotiations, the salesperson used Double-talk to avoid giving a firm price. 'The investment is commensurate with the value, which will be aligned to fit any reasonable budget, offering options that fit your investment.' This allowed them to evade a direct quote by emphasizing flexibility, avoiding any commitment to a price, keeping the buyer guessing.
• A friend used Double-talk to dodge a sensitive question about their relationship. "Things are… evolving. We're working on our dynamics." This vague statement reveals little to no information, sidestepping the need to explicitly describe their relationship's current state or address any problems, keeping the details undisclosed.
• In a heated argument, someone used Double-talk to avoid admitting fault. 'I didn't mean for my actions to cause discomfort, I understand how actions may be misinterpreted and I take that on board, that I take responsibility for.' They shift blame subtly, never explicitly apologizing or accepting responsibility for any specific actions or their consequences.