Establishment-centric

Describing a perspective, policy, or viewpoint that prioritizes or favors the existing social, political, or economic power structures and institutions, often to the exclusion or detriment of alternative viewpoints or marginalized groups. It reflects a bias towards the status quo and a resistance to significant change, typically stemming from a belief in the legitimacy and efficacy of the established order. The term can be applied to individuals, organizations, policies, or ideologies and often implies an alignment with those in positions of authority and influence. It may also manifest in a reluctance to critique or challenge the prevailing norms and values of the dominant power brokers.

Establishment-centric meaning with examples

• The media coverage of the scandal was heavily establishment-centric, focusing on the potential damage to the political party in power rather than the ethical implications of the actions. Critics argued this approach downplayed the broader societal issues at hand, revealing a bias towards preserving the existing political framework and avoiding any disruption to the established order.
• The government's economic policies were widely criticized as being establishment-centric. Critics highlighted that the policies primarily benefited large corporations and wealthy individuals, while failing to adequately address the concerns of working-class families or small businesses. This disparity further intensified societal inequality, and revealed a blind spot towards a variety of viewpoints.
• During the debates, the think tank's proposals, clearly establishment-centric, centered on incremental reforms within the existing system. They sidestepped the radical alternatives and structural changes proposed by outside groups. This approach, while potentially fostering stability, lacked in addressing deep seated issues for systemic changes.
• The university's curriculum was criticized as being establishment-centric, with a focus on Western European historical and philosophical perspectives. Critics argued this lack of diversity in course offerings left students ill-equipped to understand the global landscape, and provided little voice for emerging cultures in the international space.