Executive-guided

The adjective 'executive-guided' describes a process, decision, project, or organization that is steered, directed, or managed by, or under the authority of, a high-level executive or executives. This implies a top-down approach where key leaders exert significant control, providing oversight, making strategic choices, and often communicating directives. The term suggests a centralized structure, a reliance on executive expertise, and a focus on achieving objectives as defined by the leadership. It indicates a deliberate design prioritizing alignment with the executive's vision and priorities, even if the processes involved are decentralized and complex.

Executive-guided meaning with examples

• The company implemented an executive-guided restructuring, aiming to streamline departments and reduce costs. The CEO and CFO made all final decisions. It quickly reduced costs, but its top-down nature created resistance from middle management, who felt they were disregarded. Communication was often slow. The process proved highly efficient, albeit with some initial friction.
• The non-profit organization's fundraising campaign was executive-guided, with the board president overseeing all activities. The campaign set fundraising goals and targets and involved many volunteers, all of whom were instructed. This centralized control allowed for effective resource allocation and message consistency across fundraising and marketing. Their strong leadership helped to accomplish the budget.
• In the midst of a crisis, the country's economic response was executive-guided, with the President formulating policies. Decisions were implemented quickly and directly, but the lack of broader input and a single centralized communications channel, led to some degree of mistrust. The swift measures, were credited with stabilizing the economy, but there were lasting political ramifications.
• The project's direction was executive-guided, with the senior vice president directly involved in every aspect. The project experienced many roadblocks. This facilitated rapid adjustments and swift course corrections. The outcome satisfied its stated goals, but some team members expressed concerns about their decision-making autonomy. This top-down approach, while effective, did face some challenges.