Flattened-visioned

Flattened-visioned describes a perspective that lacks depth, nuance, and a comprehensive understanding of complex issues. Individuals exhibiting this trait often see the world in simplistic, often binary, terms, failing to appreciate the multifaceted nature of reality. Their judgment and comprehension can be severely limited by this narrow outlook, making it difficult to engage in critical thinking, empathize with different viewpoints, or consider the long-term consequences of actions. This limited perception can stem from various factors including a lack of education, exposure, or simply a resistance to confronting challenging ideas. The 'flattened' aspect refers to the lack of dimensionality in their understanding, much like a two-dimensional representation of a three-dimensional object. Such a perspective frequently leads to misinterpretations and ineffective problem-solving.

Flattened-visioned meaning with examples

• The politician's flattened-visioned approach to foreign policy, ignoring cultural nuances and historical context, repeatedly led to diplomatic failures and escalating tensions. His advisors despaired at his lack of foresight, repeatedly correcting him, but to no effect. He consistently misread the motivations of foreign leaders because he refused to look deeper. The simplified narrative he clung to had no room for shades of grey.
• Despite ample evidence to the contrary, the conspiracy theorist maintained a flattened-visioned view of the world, attributing all problems to a single, easily identifiable enemy. They dismissed any information that challenged their pre-conceived notions. Their inability to consider alternative explanations and engage with scientific findings rendered them impervious to evidence. Their view was rigid and unyielding.
• The company's marketing campaign, riddled with flattened-visioned stereotypes and lacking any sensitivity to diverse cultural backgrounds, backfired spectacularly, alienating a significant portion of the target audience and damaging the brand’s reputation. They had assumed the success of simplistic slogans would outweigh a lack of research. The damage to their credibility proved difficult to overcome.
• In attempting to understand climate change, the author's flattened-visioned portrayal, focused solely on economic costs without considering the human impact or environmental consequences, presented an incomplete and ultimately misleading picture of the crisis. Their focus was solely on the bottom line without considering the effects on the planet. Readers felt cheated by the author's bias.