Forgivableness

Forgivableness refers to the quality or state of being worthy or deserving of forgiveness; the capacity to be pardoned or excused. It encompasses the degree to which an action, omission, or characteristic is deemed excusable and capable of being forgiven, considering the context, intent, and impact. It's about the potential for reconciliation and the willingness to release someone from blame, resentment, or penalty. Assessing forgivableness involves judging the severity of the offense, the offender's remorse, and the possibility of restoration of the relationship or situation. It's a subjective measure, highly dependent on individual values, moral codes, and the nature of the relationship between those involved. Factors such as the offender's history, extenuating circumstances, and the victim's capacity for empathy greatly influence the determination of forgivableness.Ultimately, the judgment of forgivableness serves as a cornerstone for moral decision-making, promoting understanding and empathy within personal interactions as well as broader societal contexts.

Forgivableness meaning with examples

• Despite his betrayal, her initial instinct was to assess the forgivableness of his actions, considering his genuine remorse and the vulnerable circumstances that led to his deceit. She weighed the potential for rebuilding trust against the emotional damage inflicted. Her ability to gauge the forgivableness of his behavior would ultimately determine the fate of their relationship and whether she could move forward.
• The judge considered the forgivableness of the defendant's crime, weighing the gravity of the offense, the defendant's prior record, and the evidence of rehabilitation. The prosecutor argued against forgiveness, emphasizing the impact on the victim, while the defense presented mitigating factors suggesting a higher level of forgivableness. The ultimate sentence reflected the court's perception of forgivableness.
• The priest counseled the parishioner to examine the forgivableness of her own sins, encouraging her to seek redemption through repentance and self-reflection. He explained that while some transgressions might appear unforgivable, the path to spiritual peace lay in acknowledging wrongdoing and striving to amend actions. He emphasized the divine mercy and the potential for grace and forgiveness.
• In the aftermath of the scandal, the company's board struggled with assessing the forgivableness of the CEO's actions. They analyzed the extent of the damage, the impact on stakeholders, and the CEO's demonstrated contrition. Public perception of forgivableness became paramount, influencing the board's decision on whether to retain or dismiss the CEO. Their judgement would directly affect the company's future.
• The historian, examining the rise and fall of empires, pondered the forgivableness of past atrocities committed by various civilizations. Considering context, justifications, and long-term effects, they debated whether any actions could be forgiven in the scope of human history. They examined the capacity for learning from these events, striving to apply historical lessons to prevent future transgressions, and considering the concepts of justice and reconciliation.