Generalness

Generalness refers to the quality of being broad, inclusive, and lacking specific details; encompassing a wide range of subjects, ideas, or characteristics. It signifies a state of overall prevalence or commonality, often implying a superficial understanding or treatment of a subject. This term highlights the absence of specialization or particularity, emphasizing the larger picture rather than specific instances. generalness can also describe the ability to apply or relate across multiple areas or contexts, providing a unifying perspective. It suggests a summary view, focusing on the main points.

Generalness meaning with examples

• The professor criticized the presentation's generalness, stating it needed more concrete examples. The broad, sweeping statements didn't convince the audience. He wanted specific data and verifiable facts to solidify the claims. The research was too generalized, lacking the crucial details and focused analysis needed to be taken seriously by the scientific community. The audience was seeking precision, not vague concepts.
• Due to the generalness of the emergency response plan, it was difficult to implement swiftly and efficiently. There was too much abstraction. Detailed protocols would have been much more effective. It addressed broad scenarios but lacked the specialized guidelines to handle nuanced crises. The lack of specificity hindered swift action and created a difficult situation. The planning was considered to be inefficient overall.
• The generalness of his understanding of classical literature was apparent in his summary comments on the book. While he grasped the basic plot and the book's cultural significance, he missed the subtle complexities in the language. He understood the big picture, but did not demonstrate any analysis of any in-depth interpretation. His comments revealed a superficial, and general, comprehension of the work. His assessment was rather ordinary.
• The software's generalness made it usable for various projects, but it lacked the advanced features required by specialists. Its widespread compatibility proved a significant asset. Although suitable for diverse applications, specialized uses were not effective. The program was designed for the average user. It provided a broad solution that was easy to use but didn’t accommodate specific user preferences in certain contexts.