Grievance-mongering

Grievance-mongering is the act of excessively focusing on, exaggerating, or exploiting perceived injustices or complaints, often for personal or political gain. It involves amplifying minor issues, creating narratives of victimhood, and fostering resentment or division. This practice typically lacks genuine concern for resolving the underlying issues and instead prioritizes the perpetuation of a sense of grievance. It thrives on sensationalism and emotional manipulation, contributing to a climate of negativity and distrust. The motivation behind such actions can range from attention-seeking behavior to attempts to manipulate public opinion or further a specific agenda.

Grievance-mongering meaning with examples

• During the heated political debate, the candidate was accused of grievance-mongering by constantly revisiting past controversies and portraying his opponents as deliberately malicious. His constant focus on perceived slights distracted from any substantive discussion of policy and fueled a negative atmosphere.
• The media outlet was criticized for its grievance-mongering coverage of social issues, consistently highlighting instances of conflict and marginalizing efforts at reconciliation. Critics argued that the outlet preferred to sensationalize negativity rather than providing balanced and informative reporting.
• The online forum quickly devolved into grievance-mongering, with users constantly trading stories of perceived unfair treatment and fueling animosity towards various groups. Meaningful dialogue and constructive solutions became impossible amidst the constant outpouring of complaints.
• The activist group's strategy was deemed grievance-mongering by some, as they seemed more interested in highlighting injustices than seeking practical solutions. Their constant emphasis on victimhood, while well-intentioned, was deemed unproductive by their opponents.
• After the company implemented new policies, certain employees engaged in grievance-mongering, spreading rumors of unfair treatment and organizing protests, despite their apparent willingness to accept the original policies. This approach hampered sincere attempts to compromise and caused further unrest.