Hawkish

Characterized by or advocating an aggressive, uncompromising, or warlike policy, especially in foreign affairs. A hawkish stance typically prioritizes military strength, assertive diplomacy, and a willingness to use force to achieve national interests or security goals. Individuals or groups described as hawkish often believe in a strong defense, pre-emptive action, and a distrust of diplomacy or compromise with perceived adversaries. This can manifest in support for increased military spending, interventionist foreign policies, and a generally tough approach to international relations. The term implies a preference for confrontation over negotiation and a belief in the necessity of projecting power.

Hawkish meaning with examples

• Following the escalating tensions, the senator adopted a hawkish stance, calling for a significant increase in military funding and a more assertive response to the adversary's provocations. This position was widely criticized by those who sought a diplomatic solution to the ongoing crisis, promoting international collaboration to ease tensions. This demonstrated the politician's resolute belief in the supremacy of military strategies.
• The editorial board of the newspaper consistently published hawkish articles, supporting military intervention in the region and advocating for a more hardline approach towards dealing with the regime. The writers believed a show of force was necessary to prevent further aggression. Their focus on military solutions often overshadowed any discussion about the potential consequences or humanitarian costs associated with a more aggressive strategy.
• During the debate on the trade agreement, several politicians presented hawkish arguments, emphasizing the need to protect domestic industries and implement strict tariffs against imported goods. The politician's views reflected a fear of economic reliance and a desire to safeguard national economic interests, leading them to be criticized by those in support of international trade. Many feared trade wars.
• The general's hawkish approach during the strategic meeting was met with resistance from some members of the cabinet who preferred a more cautious and diplomatic approach. The general stressed the need for swift action and the necessity of securing military dominance, illustrating his unyielding belief in the importance of military preparedness and power projection.