Impermissibility

Impermissibility refers to the state or quality of being not permissible; the absolute prohibition or forbiddance of something. It signifies that an action, behavior, or situation is completely unacceptable, forbidden, or disallowed according to established rules, laws, ethical principles, or societal norms. It goes beyond mere disapproval; impermissibility implies a firm boundary that cannot be crossed without severe consequences or repercussions. The concept often relates to moral, legal, or social contexts where certain actions are deemed fundamentally wrong, harmful, or threatening to the established order. It contrasts sharply with permissibility, highlighting actions that should never be tolerated or sanctioned under any circumstances. This state is often underpinned by deeply held values and the protection of fundamental rights.

Impermissibility meaning with examples

• The judge ruled that the evidence obtained through illegal wiretapping was an egregious act, establishing its complete impermissibility in the courtroom. Presenting such evidence, due to its impermissibility, would violate the defendant's constitutional rights, leading to the evidence being excluded from the trial. The defense argued vehemently against its admission, highlighting the ethical boundaries crossed by the authorities, reinforcing the need for due process and justice.
• Given the documented history of corruption and human rights abuses, any form of trade with the oppressive regime faced near universal international condemnation. Economic collaborations were challenged because of their moral impermissibility. Many governments, corporations and individuals boycotted any activity. The widespread boycott reflected the understanding that aiding such a regime would be ethically reprehensible.
• In a professional setting, the company's zero-tolerance policy explicitly dictates the impermissibility of harassment or discrimination of any kind. Any employee found guilty of violating the policy faces severe disciplinary action, potentially including immediate termination. The policy is in place to protect all employees and create a safe workplace. The company's commitment to upholding its policy underscored the significance it places on this.
• The theologian argued for the inherent impermissibility of torture under any circumstance. The act was seen as a violation of human dignity and fundamental ethical principles, making it morally indefensible. He claimed the use of torture, regardless of the potential benefits, would corrupt any just system. The inherent injustice would invalidate the purpose of the law. It was simply not allowed.