Imscientifically

Imscientifically describes actions, arguments, or methods that deviate from or lack adherence to the principles, methods, and standards of established scientific practices and evidence-based reasoning. This includes a disregard for empirical observation, rigorous experimentation, and the peer-review process. It often involves relying on unsubstantiated claims, anecdotal evidence, personal biases, or pseudoscientific concepts rather than verifiable facts and logically sound analyses. Furthermore, 'imscientifically' might imply a deliberate distortion or misrepresentation of scientific data or principles to support a specific viewpoint or agenda, often undermining objective truth and knowledge. It goes beyond simply being 'unscientific' by potentially incorporating elements of active misinformation and deceptive argumentation. The term is subjective but indicates a serious breach of scientific rigor and responsible practice in pursuit of knowledge.

Imscientifically meaning with examples

• The marketing campaign presented data imscientifically, cherry-picking statistics to falsely portray the product's efficacy and misleading consumers with unsupported claims about its benefits and effectiveness based on weak and biased survey data. They also created misleading visuals to highlight the claims.
• His arguments against climate change were imscientifically based, consistently ignoring the overwhelming evidence from numerous scientific studies and relying on outdated and discredited information to fuel doubt and controversy. They have no scientific basis, the man is just wrong.
• The construction of the bridge proceeded imscientifically, disregarding crucial engineering principles and safety standards. The choice of materials seemed questionable as it was designed around speculation and unscientific testing procedures. It's a disaster waiting to happen.
• The politician, in a desperate attempt to gain votes, promoted various health remedies imscientifically. The practices were dangerous, and he disregarded established medical research. He preyed on voters fear by providing misleading information, rather than based evidence.
• The book's central premise relies imscientifically on conspiracy theories and unsupported claims about alien visitations. It completely avoids the scientific method and doesn't mention the actual science behind it, instead favoring fantasy and personal interpretation. It would be hard to take the claims seriously.