Invalidable
Capable of being rendered invalid; subject to being nullified, voided, or made legally ineffective. This term signifies a state of being susceptible to challenge or cancellation based on legal or factual grounds. It implies a flaw, defect, or violation that, if proven, could undermine the validity of something, be it a contract, a decision, a process, or any other legally recognized construct. The potential for being rendered invalid hinges on the presence of specific conditions or circumstances that give rise to the possibility of annulment. Actions, documents, or statements that are 'invalidable' inherently possess a vulnerability to legal scrutiny.
Invalidable meaning with examples
- The contract, though initially signed, was considered invalidable due to a clause that violated consumer protection laws. This meant that the consumer could successfully challenge it in court, rendering the agreement unenforceable. The legal team prepared to argue the specific breach of regulations and gather evidence to support the customer's case of potential fraud.
- The results of the election were deemed invalidable because of widespread irregularities and allegations of voter fraud. The recount was ordered with forensic analysis to find if the voting machines were hacked. Any tampering or deliberate miscounting would lead to a revote or the election of a new winner by the courts. The public anxiously awaited the ruling.
- The patent granted to the company for its new technology was considered invalidable because prior art demonstrated its fundamental concepts. Competitors saw this opportunity and knew that the patent could be challenged in court, undermining the company's exclusive rights and market advantage, costing millions. If proven, the patent would be revoked.
- The testimony provided by the witness was invalidable because of documented instances of perjury and contradictory statements. Because the witness was deemed unreliable, the defendant's legal team used this information to undermine the prosecution's case. The judge considered the witness' history in making their final decision.