Invalidly describes something done or existing in a way that is not correct, legal, or logically sound; based on a faulty premise or incorrect reasoning; and therefore is null and void. It often applies to actions, arguments, procedures, or claims that are flawed, deficient, or lacking in proper authority or evidence. Something done invalidly can be rendered unenforceable or ineffective. The term emphasizes the lack of validity and the consequences resulting from it, such as the rejection of a claim, the overturning of a decision, or the cancellation of an agreement.
Invalidly meaning with examples
- The contract was signed invalidly because the signatory lacked the legal authority to represent the company. Therefore, the contract was deemed null and void, as it failed to meet the required legal prerequisites. The company now has a legal hurdle. The lack of proper authorization resulted in the invalid signing of the legally binding document.
- The witness's testimony was presented invalidly due to the fact they hadn't been sworn in before the legal proceedings. Therefore, the evidence wasn't considered in the trial as the lack of oath made it inadmissible. The prosecution was hurt by the omission of important details. The court refused to accept the unsworn statement because it was presented invalidly.
- The council voted invalidly on the new zoning ordinance. It transpired that proper notice was not given to all residents prior to the meeting. The vote was later deemed void. This caused significant setbacks for developers and residents alike. The council's failure to follow proper protocol meant they had passed the ordinance invalidly.
- The scientific study was conducted invalidly due to a small and skewed sample group. The results, therefore, were considered unreliable and not suitable for the intended analysis. The researchers were forced to repeat the research to get valid results. The experiment was carried out invalidly, impacting the outcome.
- The government's claims about economic growth were presented invalidly because they cherry-picked data and ignored contradictory evidence. Thus, the public widely distrusted the statistics. Many citizens were misled by the misinformation which damaged trust. The data presented invalidly fueled public mistrust.