Jingoism

Jingoism is a fervent and often aggressive form of nationalism, characterized by excessive pride in one's country and a readiness for war. It manifests as a bellicose foreign policy driven by the belief in national superiority and the perceived need to assert dominance or defend national interests, often through military means or threats. This ideology frequently involves a disregard for the rights or interests of other nations and can lead to international tensions and conflict. Jingoistic sentiments are often fueled by emotional appeals, exaggerated narratives, and the demonization of perceived enemies.

Jingoism meaning with examples

• The newspaper's relentless barrage of nationalistic headlines, praising military might and criticizing foreign governments, was criticized as blatant jingoism. Many people felt the articles fostered an unnecessary atmosphere of hostility towards other countries. This relentless promotion of national pride, irrespective of global cooperation, created an environment of intolerance, ultimately impacting international relations and mutual understanding.
• During the pre-election rallies, the politician's speeches were filled with jingoism, promising to 'make the nation great again' through aggressive trade policies and a buildup of military strength. His followers were inflamed by his words. This appeal to nationalistic fervor aimed to exploit existing anxieties, potentially leading to isolationist policies that ultimately harmed global cooperation and economic stability.
• The historical account revealed that the rise of jingoism in the years leading up to the war was fueled by propaganda, spreading fear and hatred of neighboring nations. Misleading information, coupled with a deliberate downplaying of the human cost of conflict, primed the public for war. This manipulation contributed to a dangerous cycle of escalating tensions.
• Online forums became echo chambers of jingoism, where users constantly praised their own nation while denigrating others. This negativity created a hostile atmosphere and made constructive dialogue almost impossible. Such extreme views fostered division and prevented nuanced discussions about international affairs, isolating individuals and nations alike.
• Critics condemned the movie as a work of jingoism, glorifying war and portraying the enemy as inherently evil. The film's one-sided narrative presented a distorted view of history and did not consider the impact of conflict on both sides. This skewed representation risks fostering prejudice and misunderstanding, preventing reconciliation or mutual growth.