Know-nothing

A 'know-nothing' is an individual or group characterized by an opposition to immigration and the rights of minority groups, often fueled by nativism and xenophobia. This stance usually manifests as a suspicion of or hostility towards foreign-born individuals, cultures, and ideas. Historically, it describes a specific political movement (the American know-nothing Party in the 1850s), but the term can be applied more broadly to describe any ideology or movement expressing similar sentiments, reflecting a rejection of expertise, critical thinking, and diverse perspectives in favor of simplistic solutions and often, biased information. They generally believe that the best interests of the 'native born' are being threatened. The philosophy is often considered a form of prejudice, because it is driven by fear and ignorance of people who are different. Their focus is often to restrict immigration, and deny rights to those not perceived as 'true citizens' or 'native born'.

Know-nothing meaning with examples

• The senator's inflammatory speech, filled with unsubstantiated claims about immigrants, was widely condemned as 'know-nothing' rhetoric. It appealed to fear and prejudice, avoiding nuanced discussion and promoting a closed-minded view of global issues. The reaction revealed a surge in nativism and anti-immigrant sentiment in the region.
• Historians studying the rise of the know-nothing Party found that the party's success was due to the anxieties of many people surrounding immigration, especially of Catholics. The party's secretiveness (if asked about the group, members would say 'I know nothing') also created intrigue, but it fell apart due to internal conflict and the slavery issue.
• During the heated debate on the proposed educational reform, a panelist argued that the opposition's arguments were 'know-nothing', lacking factual basis and neglecting empirical data. This stance disregarded the professional recommendations of leading education experts. It seemed designed to undermine the process of rational debate and to avoid any compromise.
• The media often criticizes certain online forums and social media groups as 'know-nothing' platforms. These outlets spread misinformation and distrust in science and medicine. By promoting misinformation, they attempt to block any meaningful dialogue, with their only goal being to further divide society.
• Facing criticism, the company dismissed concerns as 'know-nothing' objections, prioritizing profit over environmental impact. This dismissive response indicated their complete indifference to any opposing arguments. The company's disregard for public health, and potential environmental impact, revealed a pattern of prioritizing self-interest.