Laggard-led

Characterized by or involving leadership or influence exerted by those who are slow, reluctant, or behind in progress. This implies a situation where innovation, change, or advancement is hindered due to the actions or decisions of individuals or groups known for their tardiness, backwardness, or resistance to new ideas. Often, this form of leadership results in delayed adoption of new technologies, strategies, or perspectives, ultimately impacting productivity, efficiency, and competitiveness. The phrase highlights a negative consequence stemming from the 'leaders' lack of forward thinking.

Laggard-led meaning with examples

• The company's declining market share could be directly attributed to its laggard-led approach to technological upgrades. While competitors embraced AI, the board, with its outdated viewpoints, consistently delayed investment, crippling the firm's potential for innovation. This inertia resulted in lost opportunities and eroded its position.
• The nation's environmental policies, crafted in a laggard-led manner, failed to address the urgent climate crisis. Bureaucratic inertia and the influence of fossil fuel lobbyists stalled any effective action. This hesitation created significant issues, jeopardizing ecosystems and impacting citizens' livelihoods.
• The school's curriculum, designed in a laggard-led system, struggled to incorporate modern teaching methods. A lack of imagination or innovative practices was demonstrated by many of the faculty. Student engagement suffered, and the school continued to fall behind other institutions known for their adaptability to change.
• Project management was plagued by a laggard-led culture. Key decisions were made late, resources were allocated inefficiently, and deadlines were missed. This leadership model of inefficiency meant significant issues developed, undermining teamwork and ultimately sabotaging overall project goals.
• The social reform movement's progress was hampered by a laggard-led faction which maintained out-of-date views. Their slow implementation of progressive policy undermined the momentum for impactful societal change. Those who would not come along meant great delays for a better world.