Land-rats

Land-rats, a derogatory term, typically refers to people perceived as greedy, grasping, or opportunistic individuals who exploit situations for personal gain, often at the expense of others. The label suggests a cunning, ruthless, and often parasitic nature, drawing a parallel to the behavior of rats. It can be used to describe those involved in shady business practices, political corruption, or any activity where individuals prioritize self-interest over ethical considerations or the well-being of the community. The term carries a strong connotation of disdain and moral judgment. It highlights the perceived unsavory character traits and actions of the individuals in question, implying they are willing to engage in questionable practices to achieve their goals.

Land-rats meaning with examples

• The corrupt contractor, always seeking to inflate costs, was quickly labeled a land-rat by the local community. He manipulated the system to his advantage. His unethical behavior left a bad taste in everyone's mouth. The community was trying to remove him, but the legal system seemed to enable him. His practices drained funds that could have been spent on public programs.
• The ruthless real estate mogul, known for his aggressive tactics in acquiring properties, was often called a land-rat. He drove out local residents and businesses. He would bulldoze whole neighborhoods to make way for his luxury condos, showing no regard for the people affected. His goal was profit, regardless of the consequences. He treated the city as a personal playground.
• Following the economic downturn, several financial executives who engaged in risky investments and then benefited from government bailouts were described as land-rats. Their actions caused widespread suffering. They were widely condemned for their perceived lack of empathy and their apparent willingness to prioritize personal wealth over the stability of the financial system. They profited from the crisis.
• The politician, embroiled in a bribery scandal and accused of accepting illicit funds, was quickly derided as a land-rat by his opponents and the media. His promises turned out to be empty. His actions betrayed the trust of his constituents. His constituents felt manipulated and used. He was seen as a symbol of corruption.