Misappropriate

To take something dishonestly or unlawfully, especially funds, belonging to another for one's own use. This often involves a breach of trust and is typically done in a way that is secretive or deceptive. The act implies a misuse or perversion of something entrusted to a person's care or custody, violating established protocols or ethical standards. Misappropriation can encompass various assets, from money and property to intellectual property or even information.

Misappropriate meaning with examples

• The accountant was accused of misappropriating company funds. Over a period of several years, he transferred money into a personal account, using his position of trust to hide the transactions. An internal investigation uncovered the fraudulent activity, leading to criminal charges and a loss of reputation for the firm. This highlighted the need for stricter financial oversight.
• The politician faced scrutiny for misappropriating public resources. Critics alleged he used taxpayer money to fund lavish personal expenses, including travel and entertainment. These actions sparked a public outcry, demanding greater transparency and accountability. The accusations could damage his political career if proven, resulting in investigation and possible legal ramifications.
• The art dealer was found guilty of misappropriating a valuable painting. Claiming to be the legal owner, he sold the artwork to a private collector, never intending to return it to its rightful heir. The deceitful actions violated agreements and legal frameworks, leading to legal actions and charges of fraud.
• A data breach revealed the misappropriating of sensitive customer data by a rogue employee. This was used for identity theft and fraud, which severely damaged the company's reputation and resulted in significant financial losses. The organization now faces lawsuits, which could negatively influence its future.
• The church treasurer was accused of misappropriating donations intended for charitable causes. Instead of distributing the money to those in need, he diverted the funds for personal luxuries, betraying the trust of the congregation. The scandal caused a considerable internal division. This could also have legal penalties.