Non-attribution

Non-attribution refers to the practice or policy of not identifying the source of information, data, or statements. It's a method employed to protect sources, maintain confidentiality, and encourage the free flow of sensitive or potentially controversial information. This often involves using terms like "anonymous source" or "a person familiar with the matter," without revealing the individual's identity. Non-attribution can apply to various contexts, from journalism and academic research to intelligence gathering and whistleblowing, serving to shield individuals from potential repercussions, such as retaliation, legal action, or social stigma, while still allowing the information to be disseminated. The core purpose is to enable the communication of information that might otherwise be suppressed.

Non-attribution meaning with examples

• In a groundbreaking investigation, the newspaper relied heavily on non-attribution. They published details of the corporation's questionable accounting practices, obtained through anonymous sources within the company, protecting these individuals from potential job loss and legal repercussions. This allowed for the story to be reported accurately and effectively.
• Researchers studying the impact of a new policy on vulnerable populations used Non-attribution to gather sensitive data. They interviewed participants who were promised anonymity, allowing them to speak freely about their experiences without fear of being identified or judged, leading to more honest responses in the study.
• During a crisis, government officials sometimes provide briefings on a Non-attribution basis. This lets reporters convey crucial information about unfolding events, while allowing the government to remain somewhat detached from the more detailed specifics, possibly shaping public sentiment without personal stake.
• A whistleblower leaked classified documents to the media, requesting non-attribution. This allowed the public to learn about potential government misconduct while safeguarding the whistleblower's identity, minimizing the risk of being persecuted and protecting the public interest.