Non-collaborative

The adjective 'non-collaborative' describes an individual, group, or system that does not readily cooperate or work together with others. It indicates a resistance to joint efforts, shared resources, or the exchange of ideas necessary for achieving a common goal. This behavior can stem from various factors such as a preference for independence, distrust of others, competition, or a lack of understanding of the benefits of teamwork. non-collaborative approaches often lead to isolated efforts, missed opportunities, and potentially less successful outcomes compared to collaborative strategies. It often suggests a degree of selfishness or a prioritization of individual objectives over collective ones.

Non-collaborative meaning with examples

• The research team's non-collaborative behavior hampered their progress. Each member fiercely guarded their data, refusing to share it with others, resulting in redundant experiments and duplicated efforts. Consequently, the project missed its deadlines, and the overall quality suffered because different specialties didn't merge their knowledge. A collaborative framework could have resulted in groundbreaking discoveries.
• Due to his non-collaborative attitude, John struggled in the group project. He insisted on working alone, disregarded others' suggestions, and failed to attend team meetings. His unwillingness to integrate his contributions with the team’s work caused inefficiencies, miscommunications, and ultimately a lower grade for everyone. The teacher specifically mentioned his non-collaborative attitude.
• The company's non-collaborative internal structure hindered innovation. Departments operated in silos, fiercely protecting their budgets and strategies without engaging in cross-functional communication or information sharing. This resulted in overlapping initiatives, wasted resources, and missed opportunities to create more innovative solutions through merged skills. Over time, the company’s market share declined.
• A non-collaborative approach was evident in the negotiation. Each party adopted an adversarial stance, refusing to compromise or acknowledge the other's perspective. The discussions broke down quickly, preventing a resolution. As a consequence, both sides failed to get what they needed, highlighting the futility of refusing to negotiate on common ground for a benefit.
• Her tendency to be non-collaborative made her an unpopular colleague. She consistently dismissed ideas from others, took credit for group achievements, and was unwilling to lend a hand. Consequently, she was excluded from critical projects, her career stalled, and nobody wanted to work on the same team as her for any duration of time.