Non-consequentialist
An ethical theory positing that the morality of an action is determined by factors other than its consequences, emphasizing the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions themselves. Non-consequentialism stands in contrast to consequentialist theories like utilitarianism, which judge actions primarily based on the outcomes they produce. Non-consequentialists may focus on moral duties, principles, or rights.
Non-consequentialist meaning with examples
- In the debate over euthanasia, non-consequentialist arguments emphasize the sanctity of life as a moral absolute, regardless of the potential benefits or harms associated with the act, presenting a challenge to those who advocate for a purely outcome-based justification.
- The non-consequentialist perspective in Kantian ethics asserts that lying is morally wrong, even if the lie could lead to a better outcome. This view maintains that adherence to moral principles is paramount, prioritizing duty over results.
- In discussions surrounding environmental ethics, a non-consequentialist standpoint might reject the idea that exploiting natural resources is permissible if it leads to economic gain, arguing instead that certain rights of nature must be respected, independent of human benefit.
- A non-consequentialist approach to medical ethics focuses on the principles of autonomy and informed consent, holding that respecting a patient's wishes is essential, irrespective of whether the outcome of that respect is beneficial to the patient's health.
