Non-permanent

Describing something that is not intended to last indefinitely; temporary or transient. It implies a limited duration or a lack of permanence. This could apply to physical objects, arrangements, agreements, or even states of being. The quality of being non-permanent suggests the possibility of change, obsolescence, or eventual replacement. The duration of a non-permanent item or situation can vary widely, from minutes to years, but it fundamentally lacks the enduring nature often associated with permanent entities. Furthermore, the term suggests the possibility of future alteration or complete removal.

Non-permanent meaning with examples

• The construction crew erected a non-permanent shelter to protect their equipment from the rain. This shelter was designed to be easily dismantled and moved once the project was completed. The materials used were chosen for their affordability and portability, underscoring the temporary nature of the structure. Unlike a permanent building, its purpose was strictly utilitarian and time-bound, thus showing its non-permanent design.
• The artist used non-permanent paints to create a mural on a public building, knowing the artwork would be replaced by future projects. They used water based paint, which would naturally fade and show signs of aging. This approach allowed them to express their creativity freely, understanding the impermanence of the medium was essential to its impact, proving its non-permanent characteristics.
• The company offered non-permanent employment contracts during the initial phase of their expansion. This allowed them to quickly adjust their workforce based on fluctuating demand, ensuring they could adapt to market changes without the long-term commitments. These jobs were temporary so that they would not incur extra costs. This strategy exemplified how they treated their non-permanent employment.
• The scientist conducted non-permanent experiments, as they were designed for a limited run. Each experiment relied on the previous one as it tested a new element, meaning that a new test would replace the last. This approach was valuable as it allowed for iterative learning and the adaptation of methodology as new insights emerged, clearly portraying these experiments were non-permanent.
• The agreement between the two nations was described as non-permanent, subject to periodic review and possible modification. The understanding acknowledged the dynamic nature of their relationship and allowed for revisions based on evolving political and economic landscapes. Its nature as non-permanent allowed each nation to reassess as needed and adapt to events.