Non-recommendatory

The term 'non-recommendatory' describes something that does not offer a suggestion or endorsement. It signifies a stance of neutrality or a lack of advocacy for a particular action, product, person, or course of conduct. It implies a deliberate avoidance of offering advice or expressing an opinion that could influence someone's choices. This often arises in situations demanding objectivity, where the goal is to present information without attempting to sway the recipient toward a specific conclusion. The absence of a recommendation aims to allow the audience to form their own judgments based on the presented facts and perspectives.

Non-recommendatory meaning with examples

• The report, in its non-recommendatory style, meticulously outlined the project's successes and failures, leaving the final decision regarding continuation solely to the board members. It intentionally avoided any explicit calls for future funding or termination, ensuring impartiality in the assessment. This was to prevent any conflict of interests.
• A judge’s non-recommendatory statement during the sentencing phase presented the facts of the case, the defendant's history, and the applicable laws, but it refrained from suggesting a specific sentence, allowing the jury to make their independent decision based solely on the information.
• A pharmaceutical company's advertising, presented in a non-recommendatory way, simply detailed the side effects and efficacy rates of the drug. The goal was to offer purely factual information, allowing patients, guided by their doctor's consultation, to make their own healthcare decisions.
• The academic paper, adopting a non-recommendatory approach, presented competing theories on climate change, offering evidence for each without endorsing one over the other. This promoted a more nuanced understanding for researchers and other academics as to how to assess each theory.
• Following a controversial political debate, the news channel’s follow-up piece, designed in a non-recommendatory manner, summarised the arguments made by both sides without siding with either, allowing for a more balanced perspective to be presented to the viewers. The presenters wanted no bias.