Non-verificationist

A non-verificationist is an individual who rejects the philosophical principle of verificationism. Verificationism asserts that a statement is only meaningful if it can be empirically verified or falsified. Non-verificationists, therefore, believe that statements, especially those concerning metaphysics, ethics, or aesthetics, can hold meaning even without empirical validation. They often prioritize coherence, logical consistency, or practical consequences when evaluating the validity of claims. This stance acknowledges different ways of knowing and understanding beyond scientific observation.

Non-verificationist meaning with examples

• The philosopher, a staunch non-verificationist, argued that the beauty of a sunset doesn't require scientific proof to be meaningful. Its aesthetic value is independent of empirical verification, finding its worth in subjective experience. This position allowed him to explore concepts like intrinsic goodness.
• Rejecting the constraints of verificationism, the theologian, a non-verificationist, found value in religious doctrines even if empirically untestable. Faith and belief held their own meaning and value, independent of scientific investigation, exploring the realms of the soul and the divine.
• Many historians and literary critics embrace a non-verificationist perspective, suggesting that interpretations of historical events and fictional texts can be meaningful without being scientifically 'proven.' They often focus on context and impact, recognizing various valid perspectives.
• In the realm of ethics, the moral philosopher, a firm non-verificationist, argued that ethical principles concerning right and wrong need not be scientifically verifiable to be meaningful. Moral truths are grasped through reason and intuition, not empirical tests, guiding human action.