Nonassertable

Nonassertable describes something that cannot be validly asserted, claimed, or declared as a fact, truth, or right. It signifies a proposition, statement, or belief that lacks sufficient evidence, justification, or basis to be reasonably put forward or maintained as accurate. This often applies to things outside the bounds of empirical verification, or where the supporting evidence is insufficient, contradictory, or relies on flawed logic. Essentially, a nonassertable claim is one that cannot be properly defended or established through accepted methods of proof, rationale, or observation. The term can also apply to rights or privileges that are not recognized or enforceable. The inability to assert stems from deficiencies in the quality of the supporting arguments, lack of clarity, or inherent uncertainty of the subject matter.

Nonassertable meaning with examples

• The scientist argued that certain metaphysical claims regarding the existence of a soul were nonassertable, as they could not be subjected to empirical testing or falsification. The lack of verifiable data made it impossible to assert them as scientifically sound.
• Many philosophers consider the notion of a 'completely free will' to be nonassertable. Despite its intuitive appeal, defining and providing concrete evidence for freedom from external influences, is difficult to assert within a deterministic world. This philosophical point is highly debated.
• During the legal proceedings, the defendant’s claim that they acted in self-defense was deemed nonassertable. The prosecution provided conclusive evidence challenging the defendant's version of events, making their assertion untenable.
• When discussing the complexities of quantum physics, certain interpretations of the data, like multi-verse theories, were classified by some as nonassertable hypotheses until they gain some testable evidence. This is an important feature of the field of science, as some thoughts must be withheld.
• The historian deemed the accounts of pre-literate civilizations to be nonassertable due to the lack of written documentation and the reliance on fragmented archaeological evidence and anecdotal accounts. Proving anything from this period proves very difficult.