Describing something that cannot be reasonably explained or defended as being right or fair; lacking sufficient or valid justification. It signifies an action, decision, or outcome that is deemed unacceptable because it lacks sound reasoning, compelling evidence, or moral basis. A nonjustifiable act often causes harm, violates ethical principles, or contradicts established norms. The term underscores the absence of a legitimate reason or rationale, thereby highlighting its unjust or inappropriate nature. The concept emphasizes a breach of ethical standards, logic, or fairness.
Nonjustifiable meaning with examples
- The company's decision to lay off skilled workers while simultaneously awarding massive bonuses to executives was deemed nonjustifiable by employees and the public. This decision led to widespread criticism and calls for accountability. The lack of transparency and the blatant disregard for the workers' livelihoods fueled the perception that greed, not necessity, drove the company's actions.
- Using physical force against a protesting crowd without providing any warning, constitutes a nonjustifiable use of power. This violent reaction, aimed at suppressing peaceful demonstrations, cannot be excused. It goes against fundamental principles of free speech, and the right to protest. Its brutal execution shows an abuse of power.
- A judge's verdict based on personal biases, rather than the evidence presented, is considered nonjustifiable. This type of decision undermines the integrity of the justice system. It leads to distrust in the legal process and potentially results in severe injustice, as a lack of impartiality compromises the entire system.
- Refusing to provide medical treatment to a patient because of their race or socioeconomic status is entirely nonjustifiable and violates basic human rights. Such discriminatory behavior reflects a complete lack of ethics and professional conduct. It places personal prejudice over the fundamental obligation to provide care to all individuals.
- The government's implementation of a new surveillance program without public consent or clear parameters is nonjustifiable. The lack of transparency, and the potential for misuse of collected data, create suspicion and anxiety among the citizens. The broad scope of this program violates personal privacy. There are few possible rational reasons for its implementation.