Obscenely

The adverb 'obscenely' describes something done or presented in a way that is considered offensive, indecent, or morally reprehensible, typically involving explicit or shocking depictions or expressions. It implies a violation of social norms concerning propriety, decency, and good taste. The word highlights the excessive or exaggerated nature of the offensive content, suggesting a deliberate intent to shock or disgust. 'Obscenely' can apply to various contexts, including language, art, behavior, and wealth. It often carries a judgmental tone, condemning the subject as vulgar, lewd, or depraved. The impact is usually intended to be one of repulsion or outrage, reflecting a disregard for ethical boundaries or sensitivities. The word evokes a sense of shock, disgust, and moral condemnation, making it a potent term of disapproval.

Obscenely meaning with examples

• The politician, known for his inflammatory rhetoric, attacked his opponent's policy with obscenely aggressive language, employing insults that shocked the audience and violated the standards of civilized debate. His words, dripping with vitriol, were clearly intended to offend and undermine the other candidate’s credibility. His blatant disregard for decorum left many feeling appalled and questioning his suitability for leadership. This deliberate escalation of tone was perceived as a tactic to polarize the electorate, revealing his obscenely rude political strategies.
• The artist's exhibit featured sculptures that were obscenely provocative, exploring themes of sexuality and violence with an explicit rawness that sparked widespread controversy. The pieces, intentionally designed to challenge viewers, confronted uncomfortable truths about the human condition. While some critics praised the work's boldness, many found the imagery gratuitous and exploitative. They viewed this form of self-expression as obscenely explicit, going way beyond the acceptable limits of art in a public space, ultimately leading to a debate on censorship.
• The corporation's CEO enjoyed an obscenely lavish lifestyle, indulging in extravagant purchases and private jets while laying off thousands of employees. This stark contrast between wealth and poverty ignited public outrage, leading to accusations of greed and social irresponsibility. His conspicuous consumption became a symbol of corporate excess and income inequality. This stark display of wealth appeared obscenely disproportionate to the struggles faced by his employees, revealing the gap between those who have and those who are denied.
• The film's graphic violence was obscenely gratuitous, with scenes of bloodshed and torture included solely to shock the audience. The director, seemingly prioritizing spectacle over narrative depth, pushed the boundaries of what was acceptable in mainstream cinema. Critics and audience members alike questioned the film's artistic merit and its potential impact on viewers. This obscenely violent depiction, without any apparent purpose or value, highlighted the questionable artistic choices of the director.