One-dimensionally

One-dimensionally describes a way of thinking, perceiving, or understanding something that is limited to a single aspect or characteristic, failing to account for complexity, nuance, or multiple perspectives. It signifies a simplistic, linear, and often incomplete assessment of a situation, person, or concept. This approach often disregards interconnectedness, context, and the potential for varied interpretations. People or systems functioning one-dimensionally may lack critical thinking skills and can lead to inaccurate conclusions and poor decision-making. It often highlights a lack of depth, breadth, or a holistic view. Actions and thoughts are therefore typically narrow, superficial, and lack the richness of complexity.

One-dimensionally meaning with examples

• The critic viewed the film one-dimensionally, focusing solely on plot twists and ignoring the complex character development and thematic depth, failing to appreciate its artistic merit. The review came across as shallow, providing an incomplete picture of the overall cinematic experience. His singular focus made him dismiss aspects that enriched the film for a wider audience.
• The company addressed the problem one-dimensionally, implementing a single, rigid solution without considering the diverse needs of its employees. This resulted in a lack of engagement from a few, which ultimately led to a failed initiative. They didn't seek feedback or offer alternative solutions. Their oversight revealed a lack of understanding.
• The historical account presented the events one-dimensionally, emphasizing one specific cause of the war while ignoring the intricate web of political and social factors that contributed to the conflict. Such an approach created a simplified narrative that does not offer a full and complete analysis of what happened.
• The character's portrayal in the novel was criticized for being one-dimensional, lacking depth, and personality. Critics deemed the character to be predictable, only there for a particular purpose, which did not captivate its readership. The lack of development led the readers to not become invested in the plot because they could not sympathize with the characters.
• The politician’s stance on the issue appeared one-dimensionally, reducing a complex societal problem to a simple slogan without acknowledging the multifaceted nature of the issue and the differing perspectives of the affected people. This made his solutions unpopular because they were unable to help those affected by the problem.