Re-award

To award something again, typically a prize, contract, or honor, either to the same recipient due to extenuating circumstances, changed criteria, or to a different recipient after a re-evaluation process or a challenge to the initial award. This action implies a previous awarding process and often involves a degree of reconsideration, rectification, or a fresh selection based on updated information or a revised understanding of the merit or eligibility. The process of re-awarding signifies a re-assessment of the original decision and demonstrates a commitment to fairness and accuracy in the distribution of recognition or resources.

Re-award meaning with examples

• After a successful appeal, the scholarship was re-awarded to the deserving student who initially lost out due to a technicality in the application. The university recognized the oversight and re-awarded the financial aid, ensuring the student could pursue their studies. This ensured fairness and upheld the university's commitment to academic opportunity, correcting an administrative error. The re-awarding brought justice to a flawed process.
• The construction contract was re-awarded to a different firm after the initial contractor failed to meet project deadlines and quality standards. This decisive action addressed a crucial issue, and was followed with a legal review that ultimately resulted in the decision to replace the contractor. The re-awarding prevented further delays. This ensured timely project completion.
• The gold medal was re-awarded following a doping scandal that disqualified the original winner. The Olympic committee, adhering to the rigorous anti-doping protocol, re-awarded the gold medal to the second-place finisher after thorough review. This re-awarding upheld the integrity of the competition and honored the deserving athlete's efforts. It demonstrated the importance of fair play.
• Due to changes in the project's scope, the grant was re-awarded to accommodate the adjusted budget and timeline. The funding agency, understanding the dynamic nature of research projects, re-evaluated and subsequently re-awarded the funds. This flexibility ensured the project's success.
• Following public outcry and scrutiny, the prestigious literary prize was re-awarded when it was revealed that the original winner plagiarized key sections of their novel. The awarding body, upholding the ethical and intellectual integrity of their award, promptly revoked the original award and re-awarded it to the runner-up. This action affirmed the values of their organisation.