Regrades

The act of assessing or assigning a new grade or evaluation to something that has already been graded or evaluated. This often implies a change in the initial assessment, potentially resulting in a higher or lower score. Regrading may occur in academic settings (e.g., exams, assignments), professional environments (e.g., performance reviews), or competitive fields (e.g., judging competitions). The process typically involves a re-examination of the criteria and the subject under evaluation, often prompted by a specific request or appeal.

Regrades meaning with examples

• The student, unsatisfied with their midterm exam grade, submitted a formal request for regrades, providing detailed explanations for why certain answers deserved more points. After careful review of the exam key, the professor granted several regrades, bumping the student's overall score. The revised score provided a higher grade than the original.
• Following the initial performance reviews, several employees requested regrades citing extenuating circumstances that they believed had impacted their productivity. The HR department, in a second process of the initial evaluation, assessed their contributions with the new facts. This led to the decision that they would offer the regrades and higher rankings based on the additional information.
• The panel of judges decided to issue regrades after receiving numerous complaints regarding the initial scoring of the artistic entries. They went back and evaluated each submission again. These regrades altered the final standings of some contestants. The organizers published the revised results on the competition's website.
• Due to the implementation of new grading standards, the school district decided to offer regrades for all students' assignments from the previous semester. This process involved a new process for determining a final score and a review of each student's work. This affected the end results for most students.
• The company announced regrades of the employee's performance after an extensive internal audit revealed some discrepancies in the evaluation process. The new data found a review process with additional evaluation criteria and changed the performance evaluation results for a subset of the employees. The action was taken to ensure fairness.